slk230red
Posts: 36
Joined: 2/10/2004 From: United States Status: offline
|
Justin, You didn't mention the price on the 98 SLK, but unless it is under $20,000 I would not buy this first model year car. Also, you wanted me to elaborate on my "waste of money" statement I made on a previous post. If I were buying an SLK today, I would look for a used 2001 or 2002 model. You can find many of these cars with very low mileage and in showroom condition for a lot less than the new selling price. When I purchased my 2001 SLK230 in Oct. 2000, I had to call around to find one in stock and the dealers were telling me that they were getting sticker price for these cars. After five minutes of negotiating and closing a no trade-in cash deal with the sales manager, I was told that a buyer in South Florida wanted this car for sticker price. Well Justin, things have changed. During my SIX trips to the service department over the last 2 months I couldn't believe the number of brand new 2003 and 2004 SLK models that are in stock, and a few yards away are many used SLK's for bargain prices. New models seem to come in faster than going out. Maybe this situation varies in different areas of the country, but if I were buying my first SLK today, I would be patient and look for a used, showroom condition, low mileage, garaged kept, never smoked in, like new 2001 SLK230 for between $22,000 and $25,000. They are out there and the demand has never been lower. Therefore, I would pass on the 98 model unless it is around $16,000 and you really want the car. I have my car back from the service dept. and things appear to be fixed. The dealer addressed all of my concerns and corrected the problems. The fuel sending unit was replaced when my car was in for the second service and fuel was spilled, causing fuel odors and other problems. Now I'm back to feeling good about my car and glad that I chose this model over the BMW Z3 and the Porsche Boxter. Good Luck, Dave
|